Jeeze! 28-300 is more than a 10 to 1 ratio! I'm thinking to myself (with my aging gray cells) that it wasn't long ago that I eschewed zooms with more than a 3 to 1 ratio because of the (then obvious) drop in image quality. Is it really that much better now?
Regards, Bob... ---------------------------------------------------------------- They call it PMS because Mad Cow Disease was already taken. From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Most suggestions prefer Tamron 28-200/300 XR. > > >My wife wants more zoom for her MZ-6 camera. She has a > >FAJ28-80 now. Maybe a Sigma/Tamron 28-200(300) is an > >option. Any suggestions/warnings or other ideas? The > >photos will be for the family album and not for > >professional use.
