> > From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/04/04 Tue PM 12:55:27 GMT > To: <pentax-discuss@pdml.net> > Subject: RE: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 128 (Was PESO: > Remake - Aristocrat in red) > > In Oxford advanced learner dictionary it is analects with one l. But, when > looking further down I now do find annals. > > Even the "limited" spellchecker conform it. > So my spellchecker is smarter than me ;-) > That makes me? Very limited, or an "ass/æs/ animal of horse family with long > ears and a tuft of the end of its tail". > > > Tim > Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds > (Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
Ask for comments only in Norwegian on your next submission. _Then_ we'll see...... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 4. april 2006 14:12 > > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > > Subject: Re: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 128 (Was PESO: > > Remake - Aristocrat in red) > > > > Tim, > > > > I think you meant annals, anals is something else entirely. > > > > -Adam > > > > > > Tim Øsleby wrote: > > > > >Not change # in headline. > > > > > >This is as ugly, ass can be. > > >This list _is_ the dark side ;-) > > > > > >Seriously. Isn't it "real English" to use anals as short for analects? > > >My spellchecker says no, but it is very limited. > > > > > > > > >Tim > > >Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > > > > >Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds > > >(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > > > > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Sent: 4. april 2006 02:26 > > >>To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > > >>Subject: The anals of an embarrased photographer, part 127 (Was PESO: > > >>Remake - Aristocrat in red) > > >> > > >>I had another look at the remake I submitted yesterday. > > >> > > >>And, now I am embarrassed by my lack of judgement. It is not total crap, > > >>but > > >>it sure is very muddy looking. > > >>Ok, it is crappy. I did ruin it. Just consider it a sketch that left > > >>office > > >>by accident. > > >> > > >>When doing the sandwich my mind was in single track mode. I was obsessed > > >>by > > >>getting the puzzle bits together, so I kind of forgot to look at general > > >>"picture". > > >> > > >>Besides being muddy, it also had a big dust spot. I saw that, but simply > > >>forgot to do something about it. Not an unforgivable sin, but I'm not > > >>proud > > >>of that either. > > >> > > >>The worst thing is that I can't claim to have been drinking and > > >>photoshopping. > > >> > > >>Go on, laugh and make jokes on my expense, but if you do, you also have > > to > > >>give me a warm "we all do mistakes" hug. > > >>(I really don't expect any of those hugs, I know you are evil people and > > >>will do whatever you can to rub it in ;-)) > > >> > > >>When you are done, I will have another go at the motif, waiting for the > > >>right moment, trying to get it right "in camera" (if the bird is still > > >>there). > > >> > > >> > > >>Tim, the Muddy Norwegian. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>-----Original Message----- > > >>>From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>>Sent: 3. april 2006 02:11 > > >>>To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net > > >>>Subject: PESO: Remake - Aristocrat in red > > >>> > > >>>I have done a makeover on the Aristocrat in red picture. > > >>>http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=228580 > > >>>This is a sandwich of three different exposures, all from the same > > >>>standpoint, and from the same "session". > > >>> > > >>>The result is a "new" head ;-) and a improved(?) composition. > > >>>This is the first time my hands have become dirty from working in PS. > > >>>So I would really appreciate some comments on the result. > > >>> > > >>>Whatdoyuahthink? > > >>>What about the photoshoping, anything I could have done better or > > >>>different? > > >>>Does it look "real"? > > >>>And is it an improvement? Or could I have saved me the trouble? > > >>>(The original is at a thumb below the picture for reference.) > > >>> > > >>>A lot of questions, but isn't that what life is, questions? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>Tim > > >>>Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > >>> > > >>>Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds > > >>>(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------- Email sent from www.ntlworld.com Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information
