Mark Laffey wrote: >What evidence is there that Nader voters were in fact potential Gore voters? >That is, is there any data to show that had Nader not been an option, the >people who voted for him would have voted for Gore? Surely that is the >correct question to ask. Nader voters may simply have stayed at home rather >than voting for Gore. This is a logical and empirical argument, to which bruised Dems are immune. They have an emotional need to blame Nader for the fact that their guy ran a dismal campaign, and blew what should have been a landslide. Doug
- Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Jim Devine
- ergonomics, etc. Keaney Michael
- Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Shane Mage
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Mark Laffey
- Re: ergonomics, etc. Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Doug Henwood
- Re: ergonomics, etc. Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc... Stephen E Philion
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Justin Schwartz
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Brad DeLong
- Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Shane Mage
- Re: ergonomics, etc. Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. phillp2
- Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. phillp2
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, et... Stephen E Philion
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergono... Ken Hanly