>In my experience, the phrase "nonsectarian party-building" is an oxymoron. >I'm all in favor of having leftist/socialist organizations, but the >emphasis has to be on building the _popular movement_, not the party. The >party has to be a means to that end, not an end in itself. > >Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine Unfortunately, this sounds to me like economism of the "What is to be Done" variety. Louis Proyect Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org
- Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. phillp2
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Stephen E Philion
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Ken Hanly
- Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was ... Louis Proyect
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was ... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (... Louis Proyect
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was ... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (... Louis Proyect
- "nonsectarian party-building" Jim Devine
- Re: Re: "nonsectarian party-building&... Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: "nonsectarian party-building&... Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: "nonsectarian party-building&... Jim Devine
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was ... Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (... J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Re: Socialism & American Worke... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Socialism & American W... J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was ... Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (... Louis Proyect
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (was ... Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (... Michael Perelman