Greetings Economists, Charles quotes Wikipedia about commodities production of a simple type. I would just point out that Wikipedia is a cooperative writing project, whereas here the writing project is setting down opinion.
When a topic like this comes up here, once it falls into the archives then reference to it is not likely. Or in reference to the person perhaps more than the content. Whereas Wikipedia is about reference to content in which the time aspect of writing is managed differently than a list of writings. thanks, Doyle
