Leigh Meyers writes: >> "The banks that responded to requests for comment dismissed the study's >> findings. Each >> said it used automated tools to evaluate whether loans met investor >> guidelines." >> >> Comment: Not that anything might be wrong with their 'automated tools' >> programming, the math behind the programming, or the ethical programming >> of the people purchasing the tools to sell more of what one can never >> truly 'own', the Earth.
Could you give me a concrete example of what "might be wrong" with the automated tools? If you can't think of anything concrete, feel free to give an unsubstantiated hypothetical. David Shemano
