Also, join the Novichok dots - a poison developed by Russia?
<http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=23872&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=>Oct
2006, Anna Politkovskaya, murdered while investigating 2006 spate of
Polonium poisoning in Berezovsky's wartorn Chechnya
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=23872
Deep State Conspiracy Theorists' hot war with Russia in Syria? Douma
& Salisbury WMD, Tony Gosling
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9hsMBXEigo
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/program/97024
- Big questions over Salisbury poisonings
- Alleged chemical attack in Douma, Syria
- Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen raided
- Possible military action against Syria
- Russia prepares counterstrikes
- Potential for NATO v. Russia war for Syria
Ex-BBC investigative journalist @TonyGosling
With @TREtalkIsGood - Talk Radio Europe
@BillPadley - 11:30am - Thu 12 April 2018
Who was responsible for what happened on the 4th of March in
Salisbury, UK? The British government rushed to judgement and blamed
Vladimir Putin. But how careful a construction was it?...and who else
might be more plausibly to blame. Tony Gosling gives us his view on
the recent Salisbury Poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal, as well
as his insight into the reported chemical attack in Syria...and, of
course, his take on 'The Donald's, and Theresa May's responses.....
#World News #Politics
https://www.audioboom.com/posts/6800330-ex-bbc-investigative-radio-journalist-tony-gosling-discusses-the-salisbury-poisonings-and-the-reported-chemical-attack-in-syria-from-a-different-perspective-with-tre-s-bill-padley
The Four Horsemen Gallop By 440
11 Apr, 2018 in Uncategorized by craig | View Comments
The media onslaught has moved past the attack in Salisbury by a
"weapon of mass destruction" (quoting Theresa May) which could only
be Russian, except that was untrue, and was extremely deadly, except
that was untrue too. It now focuses on an attack by chemical weapons
in Douma which "could only be" by the Russian-backed Assad regime,
except there is no evidence of that either, and indeed neutral
verified evidence from Douma is non-existent. The combination of the
two events is supposed to have the British population revved up by
jingoism, and indeed does have Tony Blair and assorted Tories revved
up, to attack Syria and potentially to enter conflict with Russia in Syria.
The "Russian" attack in Salisbury is supposed to negate the "not our
war" argument, particularly as a British policeman was unwell for a
while. Precisely what is meant to negate the "why on earth are we
entering armed confrontation with a nuclear power" argument, I do not know.
Saudi Arabia has naturally offered facilities to support the UK, US
and France in their attempt to turn the military tide in Syria in
favour of the Saudi sponsored jihadists whom Assad had come close to
defeating. That the Skripal and Douma incidents were preceded by
extremely intense diplomatic activity between Saudi Arabia,
Washington, Paris and London this year, with multiple top level
visits between capitals, is presumably supposed to be coincidence.
I am not a fan of Assad any more than I was a fan of Saddam Hussein.
But the public now understand that wars for regime change in Muslim
lands have disastrous effects in dead and maimed adults and children
and in destroyed infrastructure; our attacks unleash huge refugee
waves and directly cause terrorist attacks here at home. There is no
purpose in a military attack on Syria other than to attempt to help
the jihadists overthrow Assad. There is a reckless disregard for
evidence base on the pretexts for all this. Indeed, the more the
evidence is scrutinised, the dodgier it seems. Finally there is a
massive difference between mainstream media narrative around these
events and a deeply sceptical public, as shown in social media and in
comments sections of corporate media websites.
The notion that Britain will take part in military action against
Syria with neither investigation of the evidence nor a parliamentary
vote is worrying indeed. Without Security Council authorisation, any
such action is illegal in any event. It is worth noting that the many
commentators who attempt to portray Russia's veto of a Syria
resolution as invalid, fail to note that last week, in two separate
14 against 1 votes, the USA vetoed security council resolutions
condemning Israeli killings of unarmed demonstrators in Gaza.
The lesson the neo-cons learnt from the Iraq war is not that it was
disastrous. It was only disastrous for the dead and maimed Iraqis,
our own dead and maimed servicemen, and those whose country was
returned to medievalism. It was a great success for the neo-cons,
they made loads of money on armaments and oil. The lesson the
neo-cons learned was not to give the public in the West any time to
mount and organise opposition. Hence the destruction of Libya was
predicated on an entirely false "we have 48 hours to prevent the
massacre of the population of Benghazi" narrative. Similarly this
latest orchestrated "crisis" is being followed through into military
action at a blistering pace, as the four horsemen sweep by, scything
down reason and justice on the way.
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/04/the-four-horsemen-gallop-by
From South America, where payment must be made with subtlety, the
Bormann organization has made a substantial contribution. It has
drawn many of the brightest Jewish businessmen into a participatory
role in the development of many of its corporations, and many of
these Jews share their prosperity most generously with Israel. If
their proposals are sound, they are even provided with a specially
dispensed venture capital fund. I spoke with one Jewish businessmen
in Hartford, Connecticut. He had arrived there quite unknown several
years before our conversation, but with Bormann money as his
leverage. Today he is more than a millionaire, a quiet leader in the
community with a certain share of his profits earmarked as always for
his venture capital benefactors. This has taken place in many other
instances across America and demonstrates how Bormann's people
operate in the contemporary commercial world, in contrast to the
fanciful nonsense with which Nazis are described in so much "literature."
So much emphasis is placed on select Jewish participation in Bormann
companies that when Adolf Eichmann was seized and taken to Tel Aviv
to stand trial, it produced a shock wave in the Jewish and German
communities of Buenos Aires. Jewish leaders informed the Israeli
authorities in no uncertain terms that this must never happen again
because a repetition would permanently rupture relations with the
Germans of Latin America, as well as with the Bormann organization,
and cut off the flow of Jewish money to Israel. It never happened
again, and the pursuit of Bormann quieted down at the request of
these Jewish leaders. He is residing in an Argentinian safe haven,
protected by the most efficient German infrastructure in history as
well as by all those whose prosperity depends on his well-being.
<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>http<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>://spitfirelist.com/books/martin-bormann-nazi-in-exile/
--
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PEPIS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to pepis+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
