Kevin, On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 10:40:15AM -0500, Kevin Corry wrote: > > > Then we would augment the pfmlib_input_param_t.pfmlib_event_t structure > > with a new array to pass the unit mask descriptors. I suggest a size of 32 > > for that array. That should give us some slack. > > 32 will probably work for now. I don't know of any current systems that would > come close to filling that up. > Yes.
> If we add the APIs for getting the unit-mask number for a given name, then we > would we probably only need to add a simple array of unsigned ints (or even > shorts or chars) to pfmlib_event_t to store the unit-masks, along with a > num_masks field. > True. I think we should try that and see if this is convenient for apps. -- -Stephane _______________________________________________ perfmon mailing list [email protected] http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/perfmon/
