Buddha Buck wrote: > Perhaps someone should RFC the new special variable &ME, which is > predefined to be the whole program. Who knows? Perhaps it would then make > sense to use @_ at the top level, as if the program was invoked as > "&ME(@ARGV);"... on -objects it has been proposed that &ME is a call to the current subroutine or method; that would generalize out to this meaning at the top level only
- Re: Things to remove Nathan Torkington
- Re: Things to remove Tom Christiansen
- Re: Things to remove Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Things to remove John Porter
- Re: Things to remove Larry Wall
- Re: Things to remove Dan Sugalski
- Re: Things to remove Larry Wall
- Re: Things to remove Buddha Buck
- Re: Things to remove Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Things to remove Damian Conway
- Re: &ME David L. Nicol
- Re: Things to remove Dan Sugalski
- Re: Things to remove Nathan Torkington
- Re: Things to remove Bart Lateur
- Exception handling [Was: Re: Thi... Glenn Linderman
- Re: Exception handling [Was: Re:... Markus Peter
- Re: Exception handling [Was: Re:... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Exception handling [Was: Re:... Tony Olekshy
- Re: Exception handling [Was: Re:... Glenn Linderman