On 24 Aug 2000 20:24:52 -0000, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote: >Damian Conway's Text::Balanced module does a pretty good job of >tokenizing Perl code. However, bare C</.../> and C<?...?> require >semantic analyis to distinguish them from division and the hook >(C<A?B:C>) operator. > >To remove this hassle, and thus permit programs that analyze the >source-code of other programs, I propose requiring that all matches >require an explicit C<m>. Oh. I would have put my hopes on a better (= more generic) O::Deparse mechanism to make Perl analyse the source code for you. Rewriting a Perl in a module seems a bit silly to me. -- Bart.
- RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, even with ... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matches, e... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on matche... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m on ma... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explicit m o... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explici... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require exp... Carl Johan Berglund
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require explici... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require exp... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require... John Porter
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 135 (v2) Require... Tom Christiansen