At 02:22 PM 8/26/00 +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > It seems that it ought to be possible to evaluate something in a list
> > context and test whether there are any entries in the resulting list
> > without having to reevaluate the expression in a scalar context. The
> > work-around with the trinary operator also evaluates C<@b> twice.
> >
> > There is obviously no need to modify the behavior of the C<&&> operator.
>
>Will this have enough DWIM?
Sorry, I don't understand (I know what DWIM stands for, but not what you
mean by this sentence).
> > =head1 REFERENCES
> >
> > L<perlop/"C-style Logical Or">
>
>What about Damian's want (RFC 21)
Yes, thanks.
--
Peter Scott
Pacific Systems Design Technologies
