Peter Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think you can't just leave it at that; the implication of this > requirement is that there should be a prototype for print's optional > filehandle. I count on Larry's promise to do something about the indirect object stuff. -- Johan
- RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be functions Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be fun... Peter Scott
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be fun... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be... John Porter
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions shoul... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions s... John Porter
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functi... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions shoul... Johan Vromans
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be... David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions should be... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions shoul... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 168 (v1) Built-in functions s... John Porter