>Shoot chop. and chomp. Unless you add unchop and unchomp. Parity issue. Like >a language with YES and no NO. By that criterion, you have zillions of other things to kill. >Just kill then both. I don't think this will win us friends. --tom
- RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Casey R. Tweten
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Ed Mills
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). David H. Adler
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 195 (v1) Retire chop(). Eric Roode
- -a and @F autospliting Chaim Frenkel