On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 07:44:31PM -0500, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > Exactly the sort of chicanery grep/last is meant to avoid. So the question > > becomes, how do we crowbar "last" in without altering the returned value in > > C<map> blocks. I'm for putting it after a comma. Which matches the syntax of > > John Porter's proposal about internally converting the block to a subroutine. > > Maybe it's simply time to give up trying to bend existing semantics > and think of a new flow control keyword? I think you may be right. Graham.
- Re: $a in @b Chaim Frenkel
- Re: $a in @b Damian Conway
- C<map> in RFC 31 David L. Nicol
- Re: C<map> in RFC 31 Damian Conway
- more yield tricks ((was Re: ... David L. Nicol
- Re: more yield tricks ((was... Damian Conway
- Re: more yield tricks ((was ... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: more yield tricks ((was ... Damian Conway
- Re: $a in @b David L. Nicol
- Re: $a in @b Jarkko Hietaniemi
- RE: $a in @b Graham Barr
- RE: $a in @b Damian Conway
- RE: $a in @b Garrett Goebel
- RE: $a in @b Garrett Goebel
- Re: $a in @b John Porter
- Re: $a in @b Damian Conway
- Re: $a in @b John Porter
- Re: $a in @b David L. Nicol
- Re: $a in @b skud
- Re: $a in @b John Porter
- RE: $a in @b Damian Conway