>I am working on an RFC >to allow boolean logic ( && and || and !) to apply a number of patterns to >the same substring to allow easier mining of information out of such >constructs. What, you don't like: :-) $pattern = $conjunction eq "AND" ? join('' => map { "(?=.*$_)" } @patterns) | join("|" => @patterns); --tom
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Buddha Buck
- XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operato... Nathan Wiger
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... David Corbin
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Nathan Wiger
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Richard Proctor
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Tom Christiansen
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Michael Maraist
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Tom Christiansen
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... Bart Lateur
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?>... David L. Nicol