On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 03:39:51PM -0400, Adam Turoff wrote: > I think POD's list handling is full of warts, but what follows > is much better than HTML/DocBook itemized lists: For me, they're about the same. Actually, I'd rather read an XHTML/HTML itemized list than a POD one; they both look ugly, but the excessive vertical whitespace in POD lists makes them nigh unreadable to me. Having said that, I'm not fond of writing XML/HTML by hand. I'd far rather write an author-friendly language and have that translated to XML. - Damien
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation inste... Frank Tobin
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation ... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentat... Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for docume... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for do... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML f... Tad McClellan
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation ... Greg Williams
- Re: RFC 357 (v1) Perl should use XML for documentation ... Philip Newton