Dan Sugalski wrote: > ... > doing software copy-on-write stuff, along with having to make the garbage > collector smart enough to deal with multiple PMCs pointing to identical memory. ??? I thought that was the big deal of GC! Dealing with many references to the same thing and free the thing when there's none more... - Branden
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Sam Tregar
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Buddha M Buck
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Alan Burlison
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Dan Sugalski
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Filipe Brandenburger
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Branden
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloning? Jan Dubois
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid cloni... Branden
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avoid c... Dan Sugalski
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse or avo... Branden
- Re: GC: what is better, reuse o... Dan Sugalski