On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 01:09:11PM -0500, John Porter wrote: > > >"It isn't possible to AUTOLOAD DESTROY." --perlmem(6) > > I'm not sure what that means. Certainly AUTOLOAD gets > called if DESTROY is called but not defined ... just > like any other method. Yes, its a classic autoloader mistake to accidentally handle DESTROY calls.
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Robin Berjon
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... James Mastros
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... John Porter
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... James Mastros
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Peter Scott
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Peter Scott
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... schwern
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Piers Cawley
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Jan Dubois
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Garbage collection (was Re: JWZ on ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ Branden
- Re: JWZ on s/Java/Perl/ Dan Sugalski