On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 11:08:47AM -0800, Edward Peschko wrote: > > However, that still doesn't get rid of the gotchas - personally I think that: > > my $a, $b, $c; > > should be an error, a warning, or DWIM. Especially: Personally, I don't think so. GetOptions (foo => \my $foo, bar => \my $bar); and tie my $shoe => $tring; are just way to practical to suddenly require more hoops. Abigail
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN (Re: Clo... Peter Scott
- Re: Warnings, strict, and CPAN (Re: Clo... Dan Sugalski
- Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, strict... schwern
- Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, st... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, st... Dave Storrs
- Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, st... schwern
- Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, st... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, st... Piers Cawley
- Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, st... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Turn 'em on! (was Re: Warnings, st... Peter Scott
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs abigail
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for ... Peter Scott
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... Piers Cawley
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... Peter Scott
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Peter Scott
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Nathan Wiger
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs abigail
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for ... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... abigail
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... Edward Peschko
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... abigail