On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 03:45:21PM -0500, John Porter wrote: > But they are inextricably bound by perl's parsing rules. Perl 5's parsing rules. I don't think Perl 6 *has* a parser just yet. > You can't keep Perl6 Perl5. See? -- What happens if a big asteroid hits the Earth? Judging from realistic simulations involving a sledge hammer and a common laboratory frog, we can assume it will be pretty bad. - Dave Barry
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs David Grove
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Branden
- The binding of "my" (Re: Closures and def... Nathan Wiger
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures... Branden
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Clos... John Porter
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Closures... John Porter
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: Clos... Simon Cozens
- Re: The binding of "my" (Re: ... John Porter
- Re: The binding of "my" ... Johan Vromans
- Re: The binding of "my&qu... John Porter
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs John Porter