Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs

[John Porter]

Simon Cozens wrote:
> 
> John, settle down. None of us profess to be fantastic language designers,
> which is why we gave Larry the job. That being done, I'm not entirely sure why
> people are continuing to argue about these things. :)

You're right, of course.  I should have faith that Larry
will DTRT and not screw with the precedence of the comma.

-- 
John Porter