On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:39:25PM -0800, Edward Peschko wrote: > The current RFCs need work. Be assured that they're getting lots of top-quality work. > There are new RFCs that could be written. Its totally counter-productive to ... ship a specification to a designer, and then keep adding more and more new requests to change it. Don't you just *hate* that when people change the specifications while you're half way through writing a project? Don't do it to Perl's design. -- COBOL is for morons. -- E.W. Dijkstra
- Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...) Adam Turoff
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 362...... Edward Peschko
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 36... Simon Cozens
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RF... Edward Peschko
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was... Simon Cozens
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process... Edward Peschko
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC pro... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RF... David Grove
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was... Simon Cozens
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RFC 36... Adam Turoff
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was: RF... Edward Peschko
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process (was... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC process... Edward Peschko
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC pro... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Not revisiting the RFC... Edward Peschko