"Stephen P. Potter" wrote: > > | In Perl 6, you would do this like so: > | > | $string3 = "$string1" + "$string2"; > > Once you go this route, you've pretty much destroyed the usefulness of > having a concat operator. It is far less typing to do > > $string3 = "$string1$string2"; Agreed. The point wasn't to get rid of that usage by any means, but rather to propose an alternative to "." since that will likely get gobbled up as a replacement for ->. The only reason you'd have to use the op form of a string concat is when you have to add stuff in that isn't evaluated inside quotes, like funcs. -Nate
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Casey West
- how about just juxtaposing? (Re: Sane "+... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: how about just juxtaposing? (Re: Sane... Michael G Schwern
- Re: how about just juxtaposing? (Re: ... Casey West
- Re: how about just juxtaposing? (Re: ... Edward Peschko
- Re: how about just juxtaposing? (Re: ... David L. Nicol
- Re: how about just juxtaposing? ... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Nathan Wiger
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Dan Brian
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal John Porter
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Austin Hastings
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Michael G Schwern
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Casey West
- Re: Sane "+" string concat proposal Nathan Wiger
- Re: Sane "+" string concat prop... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Sane "+" string concat ... Dan Brian
- Re: Sane "+" string concat ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: Sane "+" string co... Dan Sugalski