I bisected it to
https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/40a953f5d9f5c661d8cf9b043643002d348a2000

On earlier rakudo versions it seems to be working fine. I haven't seen it crash
once on anything earlier, but it is *very* slow on rakudos that old, so it's
hard to tell.

nqp changes:

https://github.com/perl6/nqp/compare/2016.03-50-g512c9a1...2016.03-57-gbdb13a2

moar changes:
https://github.com/MoarVM/MoarVM/compare/2016.03-84-g4afd7b6...2016.03-104-g10d3971

On 2017-05-13 17:00:08, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote:
> FWIW the problem is still there and is reproducible with the provided
> snippet
> (just in case somebody is wondering if the issue went away by itself
> after
> these months).
>
> On 2017-04-04 06:46:20, scoli...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Le Wed, 15 Mar 2017 17:12:00 -0700, alex.jakime...@gmail.com a écrit
> > :
> > > I am getting errors like:
> > > MoarVM panic: Heap corruption detected: pointer 0x7f9a96a5e588 to
> > > past
> > > fromspace
> > > MoarVM panic: Internal error: zeroed target thread ID in work pass
> > >
> > > Even though it happens when I'm using Gumbo module, my best guess
> > > is
> > > that it is not its fault.
> > >
> > > Does not crash that fast with 「perl6 --optimize=0 …」, but crashes
> > > anyway (you may want to bump up “^100” a little bit for this).
> > >
> > > Anyway, the code to replicate the issue is shown below. If it gets
> > > mangled for some reason, here is a mirror:
> > > https://gist.github.com/AlexDaniel/ac7a4d4c49ec8d23e546529976dda67f
> > >
> > > #!/usr/bin/env perl6
> > >
> > > use Gumbo;
> > > constant URL = ‘https://perl6.org/community/’;
> > >
> > > my $response = run(:out, ‘curl’, ‘-s’, URL).out.slurp-rest;
> > > for ^100 {
> > > .say for parse-html($response).root.elements(:TAG<a>, :RECURSE);
> > > }
> > >
> > > say ‘should've crashed before reaching this’;
> >
> > I was not able to reproduce it on a 32bit Virtual Machine (debian
> > stable)
> > Using 2016.11 rakudo and the latest from git.
> > Maybe it can be related to how struct size are determined by MoarVM.
> >

Reply via email to