> When all the smoke clears, it will be relatively simple to declare an > ordered hash probably on the order of adding a single word to its > declaration. Yep. In fact, it's now relatively simple in Perl 5. You just grab the Attribute::Handlers and Tie::SortHash modules and add a single line to your program: use Attribute::Handlers autotie => { Sorted => 'Tie::SortHash' }; Then you can write: my %hash : Sorted; or: my %hash : Sorted({}, sub { $hash{$b} cmp $hash{$a}}); etc. Damian PS: Casey, if you'd like to make that even easier for users of your excellent module, send me some email.
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation David Grove
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation David L. Nicol
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Simon Cozens
- RE: what I meant about hungarian notation <C. Garrett Goebel>
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Larry Wall
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Damian Conway
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Michael G Schwern
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Me
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Buddha Buck
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Damian Conway
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation Graham Barr
- Re: what I meant about hungarian notation John Porter