> On Jan 29, 2019, at 3:43 AM, Simon Proctor <simon.proc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think part of the issue is that fundamentally Roles are intended to be a > way of doing non inheritance based classes. So composing Roles from other > Roles is an anti pattern. But why? As I stated in my previous reply: isn't it constraining for the purpose of constraining? To me Perl was always TMTOWTDI in first place. The current approach to roles contradicts this principle. Best regards, Vadim Belman
- Roles are fundamentally broken? Vadim Belman
- Re: Roles are fundamentally broken? yary
- Re: Roles are fundamentally bro... Simon Proctor
- Re: Roles are fundamentally... Vadim Belman
- Re: Roles are fundament... Laurent Rosenfeld via perl6-users
- Re: Roles are fund... Vadim Belman
- Re: Roles are ... yary
- Re: Roles ... JJ Merelo
- Re: Roles ... Vadim Belman
- Re: Roles ... yary
- Re: Roles are fundamentally bro... Vadim Belman