We could potentially give 0e0 and -0e0 the same .WHICH, which would solve the bag issue.
> On 13 Jun 2019, at 21:02, Timo Paulssen <t...@wakelift.de> wrote: > > Unfortunately, that's what the IEEE prescribes, so all we can really do is: > *shrug* > > On 13/06/2019 21:01, Sean McAfee wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:12 AM Brad Gilbert <b2gi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > (-i).reals >> (-0 -1) >> >> Ah, so it's nothing particular to Complex: >> >> > bag 0e0, -0e0 >> bag(-0, 0) >> >> Can't say I'm thrilled to have two distinct zeroes. >>
