hi, we have <=> and 'cmp' operators but we don't have the conditional constroct to use better their result : May be forthcomming switch will solve this in some way, but isn't it better to have shortcut like this : if (cond) { } else {} otherwise {} i.e. if cond == 1 then 'then-block' if cond == 0 then 'else-block' if cond == -1 then 'otherwise-block' If the "if" construct doesn't have "otherwise" it behave like the current "if-else".. ===== iVAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] =====
- Re: if then else otherwise ... raptor
- Re: if then else otherwise ... Michael G Schwern
- RE: if then else otherwise ... Sterin, Ilya
- Re: if then else otherwise ... raptor
- Re: if then else otherwise ... David Grove
- RE: if then else otherwise ... Sterin, Ilya
- Re: if then else otherwise ... raptor
- Re: if then else otherwise ... David Grove
- Re: if then else otherwise ... John Porter
- Re: if then else otherwise ... Bart Lateur
- Re: if then else otherwise ... John Porter