On Sat, 3 Nov 2001, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 06:00:42PM -0500, James Mastros wrote:
> > Right now, I'm thinking that the opcodes are going to be assigned to oplibs
> > linearly (eg the last opcode in core.ops is 292, so the first opcode in the
> > next oplib loaded will be 293).
>
> I thought that Dan's plan was that oplibs *would* grow linearly. I could
> be wrong, though.
That's the plan, yep. We'll have to make it such that oplibs can tell us
how many opcodes it has, as well as force placement of the oplib functions
in the global (or scope-local) opcode table.
Dan
