On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 10:50:52AM -0700, Glenn Linderman wrote: > > Yes, but does it call it as an instance method on the current invocant > > or as a class method with no invocant? If the former, how would you > > do the latter? > > Should both be allowed to exist? Do both exist? Why do both exist? > (with the same name). If only one exists, then that would be the one > that gets called. Making the decision based on existence implies a requirement that Perl6 methods be explicitly declared as either class or instance. Not that there's anything wrong with that; I'm just not aware of that decision having been made. I guess we won't find out for sure until either Apoc6 or Apoc12?
-- Mark J. REED <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
