At 10:41 PM -0400 5/17/02, Jeff wrote:
>I'm about ready to commit the fixes to the current assembler, which will
>finally make proper keyed aggregate access ready. Looking at the test
>suite, I see some places where we use raw opcode names, such as
>'ne_n_nc_ic'. It appears to be random, and I'd like to know if keeping
>the ability to access raw opcode names is of any use? I personally don't
>think so, beyond the dubious benefit of being able to validate that you
>meant the opcode you typed in.
Don't forget autogenerated assembly. Could be useful there.
>I'm tempted to simply rewrite the tests properly (t/op/ifunless,
>t/op/number, t/op/stacks, and t/op/time) to use the proper opcode.
>Thoughts, anyone?
Go ahead and rewrite things--that's fine.
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
