From: Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Or are you proposing to *only* replace //=? Or are you > proposing to *only* replace //= in subroutine declarations?
Only augment //= in subroutine declarations, //= would also work. > What issues did you have with //=? It seems clear and concise to me. I love the //= operator, but in the context of sub declarations it's confusing as the *only* way to default an argument. I still think = makes sense as an argument defaulter... but that issue's been settled for now and I'm not advancing it again. :-) -Miko -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
