In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>2) What PASM ops should above statement generate: > >>a) add_p_k_p_p_k (i.e. all variations of /p(_k)?/ ) > >>b) add_p_k_p_k_p_k > >> if b) how to create a NULL key and how does it look like in PBC? > >> > > As things stand it would have to be option a, or at least that is > > what > > > the current assembler would generate. There isn't much else it can do > > really - how would it know when to generate a null key for an operand > > and when not to? > > If there is a plain P0 without [], the assembler hat to insert a NULL > key instead. In other words we assume all PMC arguments have a key, so you can never have a p in a opcode name with one of k/kc/ki/kic following it? You will still get horrible op explosion for a three argument op as even if you assume that all PMCs are keyed, there are four key types which, with three operands, gives you 64 ops in total. Tom -- Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.compton.nu
