Damian Conway wrote:
my $iter = fibses(); for < <$iter> > {...}(Careful with those single angles, Eugene!)
Operator << isn't legal when the grammar is expecting an expression, right? The < must begin the circumfix <> operator. Is the grammar being weakened so that yacc can handle it? The rule engine is still talked about, but sometimes I get the feeling that people don't want to depend on it. That < <$iter> > syntax reminds me too much of C++. - Ken