> I think that solves all the problems we're having. We change \c to > have more flexible meanings, with \0o, \0x, \0d, \0b, \o, \x as > shortcuts. Boom, we're done. Thanks!
How far can we go with this \c thing? How about: print "\c[72, 101, 108, 108, 111]"; will that print "Hello"? Dave.