Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Okay, here's try three. I think I'm about ready to POD this up as a > formal spec to be assaulted, but this version is more a sketch than > anything:
[...] Am I reading it right if I reckon that a Class isa Object? and an Object hasa Class (assuming that the object is, um, Classy)? -- Piers
