On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:04:25PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
> All this "make sure no warnings fired" is good thinking. But why not
> roll it into Test::Harness, and make it switch selectable? It's
> really T::H that we want keeping an eye on this, right?
No, its definately a test feature. Much easier to set up (no MakeMaker
muckery), finer granularity (can be done on a per test file basis rather
than a whole suite) and can distinguish between warnings and diagnostic
output (ie. warn() vs diag() vs print STDERR).
Besides, Test::Harness can't portably trap STDERR. If you can figure out
a way to do it that would solve lots of problems.
If you want to do it to a whole test suite, PERL5OPT=-MTest::Warn::None comes
to mind.
--
"Congratulations, you're a thieving bastard... Now give me back my pants."
"That's MISTER Pants!"
-- Ian's Adventures In Morrowind
http://www.machall.com/morrowind/page3.html
