Whoops. Needed to go to the list as well.
> ------------Original Message-------------
> From: "Clinton Pierce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Dan Sugalski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, Jul-4-2003 4:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Parrot is feature-frozen until Wednesday
>
> > It crashes rather badly in a number of spots on OS X, unfortunately.
> > I've also noticed that we have no Win32 systems in the tinderbox. Are
> > we building OK on Win32 anywhere?
>
> I don't have a stable/spare Win32 box to donate as tinder... but.
>
> Win32 build seems okay as of last night. One eye-catching error at the end of the
> build is:
>
> link -out:imcc.exe -nologo -nodefaultlib -release -machine:x86
> imcparser.obj imcl
> exer.obj imc.obj stacks.obj symreg.obj instructions.obj cfg.obj sets.obj debug.obj
> optimiz
> er.obj pbc.obj main.obj parser_util.obj jit.obj ../../blib/lib/libparrot_s.lib
> oldnames.lib
> kernel32.lib user32.lib gdi32.lib winspool.lib comdlg32.lib advapi32.lib shell32.lib
> ole32.l
> ib oleaut32.lib netapi32.lib uuid.lib wsock32.lib mpr.lib winmm.lib version.lib
> odbc32.lib o
> dbccp32.lib msvcrt.lib
> # the chmod doesn't work here, so move imcc and make it again :-(
> '#' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
> operable program or batch file.
> NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '#' : return code '0x1'
> Stop.
>
> But everything else *looks* okay.
>
> Some tests fail though. The summary is:
>
> Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> t/op/stacks.t 2 512 43 2 4.65% 3, 6
> t/pmc/intlist.t 1 256 9 1 11.11% 6
> t/pmc/io.t 2 512 4 2 50.00% 3-4
> t/pmc/nci.t 4 1024 10 4 40.00% 2, 6, 8, 10
> t/src/manifest.t 3 768 4 3 75.00% 2-4
> t/src/sprintf.t 1 256 2 1 50.00% 2
> 10 subtests skipped.
> Failed 6/49 test scripts, 87.76% okay. 13/751 subtests failed, 98.27% okay.
> NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\Perl\bin\perl.exe' : return code '0xff'
> Stop.
>
> Given today's off-and-on power situation in Southeast Michigan, I have no tuits
> round or otherwise to dive in futher.
>
>
