However, I see your point. To be orthogonal would suggest that we implement the same feature for .pcc_call that we do for the .pcc_sub
I meant .pcc_begin here since that is where the proto|non_proto goes.
-Melvin
I meant .pcc_begin here since that is where the proto|non_proto goes.
-Melvin
- Re: [BUG] IMCC looking in P3[0] for 1st arg Leopold Toetsch
- Re: [BUG] IMCC looking in P3[0] for 1st arg Steve Fink
- Re: [BUG] IMCC looking in P3[0] for 1st arg Leopold Toetsch
- NULL Px proposal (was Re: [BUG] IMCC looking ... Melvin Smith
- Re: NULL Px proposal (was Re: [BUG] IMCC ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: NULL Px proposal (was Re: [BUG] IMCC ... Jeff Clites
- Re: NULL Px proposal (was Re: [BUG] ... Melvin Smith
- Re: NULL Px proposal (was Re: [BUG] ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: [BUG] IMCC looking in P3[0] for 1st arg Steve Fink
- Re: [BUG] IMCC looking in P3[0] for 1st arg Melvin Smith
- Re: [BUG] IMCC looking in P3[0] for 1st arg Melvin Smith
- Re: [BUG] IMCC looking in P3[0] for 1st arg Steve Fink
- Re: [BUG] IMCC looking in P3[0] for 1st a... Melvin Smith
- Re: [BUG] IMCC looking in P3[0] for ... Leopold Toetsch
- Re: [BUG] IMCC looking in P3[0] for 1st a... Leopold Toetsch
- PCC (was: [BUG] IMCC looking in P3[0] for 1st arg... Leopold Toetsch
- Re: [BUG] IMCC looking in P3[0] for 1st arg Melvin Smith
