Hi all, > - Irresolute (Windows) > Fails in compiling jit_cpu.c: with > d:\cvsprojects\parrot\src\jit_cpu.c(95) : error C2065: 'RTYPE_COM' :undeclared identifier > hidden a huge bunch of warnings. > Does JIT work on windows? > Maybe it works if configured with --jitcapable=0 > BTW: It does make but nmake test and make seems to fail right away. Just checked into all of this and no, things are not at all good on Win32 - warnings galore. It does work with --jitcapable=0, but it used to work without that. How long it's been broken I can't say - I have just started uni, and haven't had as much time as I would have liked to follow things on parrot. The errors making JIT fails with include:-
jit_cpu.c(95) : error C2065: 'RTYPE_COM' : undeclared identifier jit_cpu.c(149) : error C2065: 'EXEC_CALLDISP' : undeclared identifier The warnings mostly all take this kinda form:- jit_cpu.c(318) : warning C4305: '=' : truncation from 'const long ' to 'char ' jit_cpu.c(319) : warning C4305: '=' : truncation from 'const int ' to 'char ' There are also various other warnings of a similar nature in non-JIT stuff (but not so many) and a few "unreferenced local variable" warnings. As for tests:- Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- t\src\extend.t 1 256 12 1 8.33% 11 t\src\io.t 2 512 16 2 12.50% 9-10 3 subtests skipped. Failed 2/9 test scripts, 77.78% okay. 3/59 subtests failed, 94.92% okay. NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'F:\Perl\bin\perl.exe' : return code '0xff' Stop. Here's one of them:- t\src\extend......NOK 11# got: 'in sub1 # hello in sub2 # back # back # ' # expected: 'in sub1 # back # hello in sub2 # back # ' And the others:- t\src\io..........NOK 9# Failed test (t\src\io.t at line 242) # got: '"temp.file" ">" should have opened # "temp.file" ">>" should have opened # "temp.file" "+<" should have opened # "temp.file" "+>" should have opened # "does_not_exist" ">>" should have opened # "does_not_exist" "+<" should have opened # "does_not_exist" "+>" should have opened # done # ' # expected: 'done # ' # Failed test (t\src\io.t at line 293) t\src\io..........NOK 10# got: 'should have read "." not ".?2"done # ' # expected: 'done # ' If anyone wants to see all the errors, let me know. It's kinda long so I didn't wanna send it straight to the list. Hope this helps, Jonathan
