Matt Fowles writes: > All~ > > Of late it seems that everybody has been throwing around their own > little homegrown benchmarks to support their points. But many people > frequently point out that these benchmarks are flawed on one way or another. > > I suggest that we add a benchmark/ subdirectory and create a canonical > suite of benchmarks that exercise things well (and hopefully fully). > Then we can all post relative times for runs on this benchmark suite, > and we will know exactly what is being tested and how valid it is.
Like, for example, examples/benchmarks ? It's quite difficult to create benchmarks that test *everything*. But any time someone posts a good benchmark, it really should go in here. Hopefully with some documentation describing what it tests. Luke
