Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So why does the generated pasm work where the PIR doesn't?
The generated PASM is all one compilation unit. Your (local) labels are fixed up properly. In your PIR code you had local labels (w/o) underscore refering to different compilation units. > I can see why saving P0-2 would be a good idea, but after doesn't need > any of the other registers. s. a different f'up. leo
