On Oct 5, 2004, at 11:25 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
I wonder whether we shouldn't try to standardise the target name before it's too late to do so. Module::Build uses covertest, I've always used cover, and Geoff has just used test-cover.
Actually, Module::Build uses "testcover".
I'm not overly concerned, but I'll admit to preferring something starting with cover, because it completes more easily. (Yes, I'm that lazy. I even have make aliased to n.)
I think that Dave called it "testcover" in Module::Build because it runs the tests first, and then runs cover.
So, standardise on covertest? Opinions?
You'll have to convince the Module::Build folks to change...Personally, don't care one way or the other.
Regards,
David
