On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 11:15:14 -0800, Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 10:25:49AM -0700, Luke Palmer wrote: > : But this convention provides much more accuracy than memorizing a list > : of methods that don't automatically thread, or memorizing a list of > : iterator methods that act on the iterator and not its current value. > > Except that you don't actually have to memorize a list. Methods thread > on their invocant only if their invocant isn't a Junction. Its > mnemonic value is no better or worse than any other MMD distinction.
Is this behavior exclusive to methods? Or does something like this: 3.14159 + "1"|2; try to MMD-dispatch to: multi sub *infix:<+> (Num $foo, Str|Int $bar) instead of (or before) threading? Ashley Winters
