Michael G Schwern wrote: >> An alternative is to drop the ugly ok2() and force the test writer to >> use: >> >> ok(1 == 2, ""); >> >> I prefer that since I want to make it hard for people to avoid giving >> a test a name, er, comment. > > At the very least some better name than ok2().
Name suggestions gratefully received. I wanted something short, to make it easier than "ok(1 == 1, "");", and ok2() fits in with the historical naming of functions like wait(), wait2(), wait3(), wait4(), and so on. N -- 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 -- The 75 column-ometer Not speaking on behalf of my employer. </bush>