those inclined to not put a name/comment/label on their test will not do it
whatever we end up calling it. IMO the only way to get people to do it would
be to make it required, and I don't think that is a good idea.
I like "label", but to me that also implies a (somewhat-less-than-name) unique identifier.
I also like H. Merjin's suggestions of "tag", however it might be confusing to the more
web-inclinded. (Tag as in shirt-tag, not as in HTML-tag)
Personally I use them like comments, so that makes the most sense to me.
Steve
On Dec 6, 2004, at 11:28 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
I think even better than
ok( $expr, "name" );
or
ok( $expr, "comment" );
is
ok( $expr, "label" );
RJBS points out that "comment" implies "not really worth doing",
and I still don't like "name" because it implies (to me) a unique identifier.
We also talked about "description", but "description" is just soooo
overloaded.
Thoughts?
xoxo, Andy
-- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
