On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 16:39 -0800, Ovid wrote: > Let me second that one! Of course, Andy's already made it clear that > he doesn't have a lot of time, but I still don't mind kicking 'im. :)
I think the right approach is to patch T::H::S to collect diagnostic information and make it available. It's easy enough to grab it via IPC::Open3 elsewhere and pass a combined STDOUT/STDERR filehandle to analyze_fh(). That may alleviate the need to change the subprocess launching in T::H::S. -- c
