On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 12:44:06PM -0600, Rod Adams wrote:
: What I'm asking is if we are going to continue allowing:
:
: delete %x<foo>;
: if exists %x<foo> { ... }
:
: or make it where you instead have to say
:
: %x.delete('foo');
: if %x.exists('foo') { ... }They can always just be macros that translate the unary form to the method. If you define them as term:<delete> and term:<exists> they won't show up unexpectedly when the parser is looking for method names. Larry
