On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 02:53:54PM +0200, Juerd wrote: : Hm, if ==> and <== are made special syntax, maybe this would be : possible? : : @foo ==> zip <== @bar
It's already the case that <== binds tighter, so it should work the same as @foo ==> (zip <== @bar) or zip <== @bar <== @foo or zip(@bar; @foo) Which, considering zip *is* going to care about multidimensional slices, should do the right thing, presuming you really wanted @bar in front. Ordinarily I'd write it @foo ==> zip <== @bar to make it a little clearer. You'll note that <== is really just a version of ; that doesn't require brackets. Larry