On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 09:20:21AM -0700, Larry Wall wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:55:43AM -0500, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: > : But perhaps the reduce operator is some of that sufficiently advanced > : technology that "knows" how the operator it wraps is slotted and does > : something appropriate. > > Possibly. Or we just define infix .{}. and .[]. variants, or some such.
It's funny what a big difference that extra character makes. As much as I disliked Juerd's idea to make infix .{} work, I wouldn't mind an infix .{}. operator. -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]